Gleason had conceived the story himself years earlier and had long dreamed of making the film. He wanted Orson Welles as director, and Paddy Chayefsky as screenwriter. Though Welles was an old friend, the board at Fox rejected him as being an overspender. Gene Kelly was selected as a compromise. Chayefsky was not interested and John Patrick, writer of Teahouse of the August Moon was signed instead.
The film was shot on location in Paris. Most of the production crew and cast were French, some spoke no English. Gleason bore with this in two ways: Kelly spoke French, and Gleason's character had no lines, being mute.
Gleason was extremely proud of the film, which earned one Academy Award nomination for Best Adapted Score. Gleason received a story credit and a music credit. On the other hand, according to the book, The Films of Gene Kelly, by Tony Thomas, Kelly himself said that the movie "had been so drastically cut and reedited that it had little to do with my version"..
One rainy evening he returns home to find Collette (Katherine Kath) and her young daughter Nicole (Diane Gardner) sitting in a doorway trying to keep dry. He lets them stay at his apartment. Collette is suspicious of Gigot but young Nicole warms to him.
Gigot entertains the little girl by dancing to his old Victrola and by dressing as a waiter to feed a mouse. He is protective of Nicole, once running alongside her on a merry-go-round to make sure she doesn't fall off. It is this protectiveness that leads him to prevent Collette from soliciting a john on a park bench near the merry-go-round. Gigot is beaten by the frustrated man for his troubles.
The baker discovers the theft, and soon Gigot is a suspect. Two bureaucrats called in by one of Gigot's neighbors have come to (apparently) have Gigot committed. But Gigot and Nicole are only at an abandoned basement, listening to the Victrola while Gigot dances -- with a little too much gusto, though, as the roof falls in. Gigot is unhurt, but Nicole is unconscious.
Frightened, he takes the girl to the church, where the parish priest calls a doctor. Thinking the Victrola may help, he goes back to retrieve it and runs straight into an angry mob. The mob chases Gigot to an old coal loader. Gigot falls into the river and does not resurface.
The locals think Gigot is dead, and organise a funeral for him. Gigot is merely hiding. He sees the funeral march and, as always, follows. When the time comes for the eulogy, he realizes it is he for whom they are holding the service. Suddenly, one of the mourners sees Gigot, and the chase starts again...
oh, my--and what ever happened to diane gardner, the little nicole??? she was such a cutie!
ReplyDeleteShe can be found on facebook
Deleteaccording to rumor - too much "editing"
DeleteI don't like this film and I'm a huge Gleason fan. One of his writers supposedly said to him after seeing this film "It's not humor Jackie, it's mental retardation" I agree and think only Chaplin had the skill and taste to pull off that kind of sentimentality.
ReplyDeleteIt has humor in it. What are you ,blind. Gleason did an excellent job. You are wrong period.
DeleteI always dismissed Jackie Gleason as "just another actor" - nothing special, until I saw this movie. Chaplin's skill was all in his body movements, executed with a dead-pan expression, whilst Gleason managed to convey a wide range of emotions with his facial expressions. To do that without even speaking a word; note that there are two or three scenes in this movie where you even suspect that he will magically find a voice, but he doesn't. To do so would have completely destroyed the feeling of the film. This is the mark of a true artist.
DeleteI loved the movie as a child and I still love it! I think the reason it was not popular in the states is because at that time they were dealing with the cold War politics and wanted to go in to their own mind, like a Brain Shelter. They did not want to face their own bigotry at the time that included homelessness.
DeleteSeriously? I think Jackie Gleason went BEYOND Chaplin..one is great ,and one is Genius. I almost forgot about this gem of a movie,as I was very young when I first saw it..today ,as a "seasoned" adult,I can appreciate many things this film is about..it is a very human film..
DeleteI guess I'm a softee at heart. Gleason's portrayal of an innocent concerned only with the happiness and welfare of others touched my heart. Alternately I was angry with the towns folk taking advantage and making fun of such an innocent soul.
DeleteIt is most difficult to imagine anyone disliking the film 'Gigot', period. I saw it as a 12 year old and it simply blew me away with the story, the location, the actors, the music, the scenes, the everything about it, including the inhumanity, as suggested, of man. And it was gross negligence of the Academy for not having applauded Jackie Gleason as Nest Actor.
DeleteOne of my most if not my favorite films of all times. Jackie Gleason was phenomenal in his role of "Gigot"..Jackie clearly put his heart and soul into tho film. His talent doesn't end there. Jack's was a very talented and under recognized writer of music, including the musical score to Bigot. Jackie has written MANY famous songs that most have no idea were written by him. I miss him.
DeleteI don't know Greg - I disagree. While Gleason was no Chaplin, I think Gleason worked well in the role.
ReplyDeleteCould not agree more with David L. Saw this movie as a teen and was amazed at how much that I learned about humanity - something that we could sure use just now. It spoke volumes to me about how someone with almost completely nothing could selflessly try to help those around him whom he believe had less than himself.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree David. This movie is a classic. I remember seeing this movie when I was 11 and it stayed in my mind & heart. I still cry when I see it. It teaches us that we need to be kind to one another and not judge those who are less fortunate, at least that was my take on the movie and I feel the same way now. This movie is now available on DVD. 20th century finally released it after receiving over a million requests I believe. You can find it on amazon and best buy.
ReplyDeleteLike many others, I saw this movie as a kid and it had me both laughing and crying by turns. Recently, I was pleased to see that TCM showed it, after having been forgotten for so many years. I think it's high time that this gem of a classic got its due.
ReplyDeleteThis film is a brilliant work that should have underscored the talent Mr. Gleason had. I think Greg is a bit misguided in his thinking and criticism of the film. It was a daring film for its time.
ReplyDeleteEmpathy what a valuable lesson learned from this movie. If only our children were able to view it in our time. Our world needs alot more of it....Empathy and its sidekick...Compassion .
ReplyDeleteThe Great One...Another good one is - 'Papa's Delicate Condition'...
ReplyDeleteThat's why he was called 'The Great One' ~ 'Papa's Delicate Condition' is another good one...
ReplyDeleteMaudlin sentimentality. An embarrassment.
ReplyDeleteEmbarrassment only to those who have no heart and care not for others.
DeleteI first saw this film with my Mom and feel in love with it. I had recalled Gleason as always being a loud person, but for him to play a mute was just amazing and I gave him much more respect as an actor
ReplyDeleteJust saw this movie and it was touching and heartwarming. Jackie Gleason was versatile. Displaying different emotions. At times it made me teary and at times made me chuckle. LOVE IT!
ReplyDeleteSaw this movie when I was 7 or 8 years old. Watched it again 50 years later and it still held up. Loved it! One of my favorites. Jackie Gleason was brilliant!
ReplyDeleteIt’s easy for critics to take the odd dig at a film like this – an artist expressing his artistic side even if it seems unsuited. Critics like to put personalities into categories, especially those like the versatile Jackie Gleason. He was an artist who obviously didn’t like being typecast or easily pigeonholed and Gigot is a prime example, even if sometimes eccentric. Here he writes the story, the music, and takes the lead. Perhaps Gene Kelly might not have been the right director for this exercise but it fitted with his likening to attempt unusual subjects – and Gigot is certainly unusual.
ReplyDeleteThere are shades of Keaton and Chaplin and even though Kelly says Seven Arts made many cuts that he and Gleason did not approve of - the movie, as it stands, could perhaps still do with a couple of minor trims. Gleason was a large heavy-set man and the way he was able to throw himself around suggests he must have seriously trained to take falls during a surprisingly active career.
Regardless of the odd overindulged scenes, Gigot offers many thoughtful and poignant sequences and is far better than many overrated (even awarded) works that have come and gone since. Cinematically it’s wonderfully shot by Jean Bourgoin (Mon Oncle ’58) with many beautifully set-up situations helping to unfold a story that while offering some off the wall characters, also challenges us to consider those less fortunate with several poignant scenes. It stands as a one-of-a-kind specialist enterprise, well worth a look and the ‘Shock’ Hollywood Gold Series DVD is a welcome, nicely transferred addition to any collector’s shelves. Many people have this as one of their favorite movies and it’s easy to see why.
Gigot is an excellent movie. I don't care how many years or decades will pass. I don't care how dumb and cold people become that they do not appreciate this story. It is a wonderful and marvelous movie. It is also very sad.
ReplyDelete